|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Themes - first, last or not at all?
Just wondered how people handle the idea of "themes" when they're writing?
I find this interesting, because almost every "How to Write" book I've ever read says you have to know the central theme/premise/"what the story is REALLY about" (whatever you want to call it) of your work before you begin. This way you can structure your plot around it, as well as individual character arcs. This seems to be the case particularly in screenplays, where structure is so important. But whenever I hear a writer I really like and admire talk about this - be it Philip Pullman, Stephen King or Russell T Davies - they all say the same thing: they never have a theme in mind when writing a story. They write about characters, and interesting things happening to characters. King says that if he picks up that there is a theme after his first draft, he'll try to weave it in more strongly in the second draft, but that's not why he's telling the story. I can see the benefits and dangers of both approaches. For the "no theme" approach, there's a risk the story will be rambling and unfocused, even perhaps uninvolving. But when a writer starts with a theme, there's a risk the story will become preachy. How do you all approach this?
__________________
![]() ![]() Chestnut and unicorn tail hair, 10 3/4 inches, unyielding |
Sponsored Links |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Themes - first, last or not at all?
I once read it (can't remember where, though), that you don't have to 'think' of a theme for your story. If the story has a good plot and well-developed characters, the themes ought to show in the writing, without the writer intending that.
In my latest bit of writing, I took that advice and didn't 'pick up' a theme, before starting. I just planned out the plot and the characters, and throughout the writing, I felt the theme showing in different situations without my planning that. Personally, I don't like the writing which focuses on the theme more than the plot or characters, because it feels like an idea/concept forced on the reader, more than something that enriches the writing and makes it meaningful as well as enjoyable.
__________________
![]() Thanks to my secret sigswitch maker, for the wonderful avatar and signature! ![]() Sig/avatar pictures by Cassandra Austen. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Themes - first, last or not at all?
Quote:
__________________
A patriot is someone who wants the best for his country, including the best laws and the best ideals. It's something other people should call you -- you shouldn't call yourself that. People who call themselves patriots are usually liars. -- Donald Woods You got what anybody gets . . . You got a lifetime. -- Death of the Endless |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Themes - first, last or not at all?
Yes, and Pullman/Davies said exaxctly the same thing in Davies's The Writer's Tale! Davies says "maybe that's how bad scripts are written".
__________________
![]() ![]() Chestnut and unicorn tail hair, 10 3/4 inches, unyielding |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Themes - first, last or not at all?
First of all, I think one should have a good story to tell.
Themes should be secondary and from my point of view, they should never take over the story itself. This isn't a hard and fast rule, as there are obvious exceptions (such as the old Good vs. Evil schtick). However, I think the writer would face a losing proposition if s/he's promoting some sort of agenda.
__________________
All fighters are pig-headed some way or another: some part of them always thinks they know better than you about something. Truth is: even if they're wrong, even if that one thing is going to be the ruin of them, if you can beat that last bad out of them... they ain't fighters at all. ![]() ---Eddie Scrap-Iron Dupris (Million Dollar Baby)
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Themes - first, last or not at all?
I think themes are important in any work but I also feel that they should come naturally, not forced.
Most writers, myself included, start writing a story either plot-based or character-based i.e either the plot is the center of attention or the characters are (in most stories, both aspects become important once you've start writing. At least, in my experience). If both the plot and characters are 'strong' than the theme will naturally arise from what you've already set up. I've found that first I'll think of a story idea and the plot, characters, settings, etc behind it. As I begin to write, I'll find that there is a theme to what I'm writing/trying to get to so I'll go ahead and weave that in a bit more strongly. I guess the theme kind of comes middle/last during the writing process, at least for me. For some writers, it's possible they decide on a theme from the start (ex. good v. evil) and than find a story/characters that would best exemplify this theme. That scenario could definitely happen and I'm sure it does (in fact, I've read so many classical books in my English classes that I tend to think the author thought up the theme before the plot/characters!). But for me, personally, the theme comes a bit later. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Themes - first, last or not at all?
Ray Bradbury on symbolism which, like themes, should occur not be imposed.
http://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/sci...symbolism.html
__________________
A patriot is someone who wants the best for his country, including the best laws and the best ideals. It's something other people should call you -- you shouldn't call yourself that. People who call themselves patriots are usually liars. -- Donald Woods You got what anybody gets . . . You got a lifetime. -- Death of the Endless |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Original content is Copyright © MMII - MMVIII, CoSForums.com. All Rights Reserved. Other content (posts, images, etc) is Copyright © its respective owners. |