Male Circumcision and Bodily Autonomy

[NumberEight]

Originally Posted by Midnightsfire

Your exact words; Male circumcision is also unconstitutional.

Thus an invalid claim.

He explained why he believes that. He mentioned the 14th amendment. Therefore, it is not an invalid claim. It makes logical sense.

Originally Posted by Midnightsfire

Only how you desire to define circumcision is.
A doctor and a lawyer will tell you differently.

Why do you think that is?

[halfbreedlover]

Originally Posted by Midnightsfire

Only how you desire to define circumcision is.
A doctor and a lawyer will tell you differently.



Your exact words; Male circumcision is also unconstitutional.

Thus an invalid claim.

He's saying it is unconstitutional to allow male circumcision and at the same time prohibit female circumcision. It is a form of gender discrimination to protect girl-children and not boy-children from this violation of their bodily autonomy.

[Alastor]

As you all know, bickering about the the constitution of the US is to be held in the USPD, not here in the DoIMC.

*lock*