View Single Post
  #10  
Old October 11th, 2007, 4:11 pm
dogma_man926  Male.gif dogma_man926 is offline
First Year
 
Join Date: 10th October 2007
Posts: 9
Re: Underage magic - is the MOM really on top of it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lflores View Post
This is how I always saw the law to work. To help enforce the Statue of Secrecy and also to make sure younger wizards don't pick on muggles. This would explain why Harry got in trouble for Dobby (Aunt Marge is hurt/affected), why he got in trouble for the Patronus in OotP (Dudley is hurt/affected), and why he didn't for the Lumos charms or other such charms done at 4 Privet. Tonks, Dumbledore, and the Weasley's have all done magic at that adress.
Very good point i never actually thought about it that way. harry only got in trouble ih he was the only wizard there. but didnt get in trouble if there were older witches or wizards around. but if the mom cant detect who did it. then they cant detect if there is more than one witch or wizard in the house right. so there fore harry should have gotten in trouble for all the magic done at privet drive just because he lived there and the mom knew he lived there and didnt know that the other wizards and witches were there when they were.


Sponsored Links